Beta male in dating world

This is a real post I saw on my Facebook feed one day by a young attractive woman: It had only been a a few minutes since she had made the post, yet it had already received 45 likes. To be fair, there were some not-so-positive comments as well, but the slobbering positive ones outweighed the negative ones by about five to one.So yes, this is a very serious problem with strong implications that indeed negatively affect the women you meet in a very real way. One of the reasons women over age 33 reject Alphas their age so quickly is because they know there’s a line of betas standing outside their door ready to obey whatever silly ASD-based dating rules they have. One of the reasons there is so much anger against beta males in the manosphere is because of the great damage betas do to all men by behaving this way with women.They could fuck other women, including prostitutes, and their wives/girlfriends/lovers could care less as long as the bills were paid and/or other promises were kept.

I was alive and post-pubescent in 1986 (it was the year I started high school) so I’ll use that as a comparison point. Just indulge me and go with the 25% figure for a minute, which I fully concede may be way off (be it too high or too low). Regardless, clearly more lean, muscular guys have an advantage over skinny or chubby guys. The point is, you should do this anyway, regardless of what you want to accomplish in the woman-side of your life.

Back in ’86 there was no internet, no cell phones (at least not really), and no social media. This means that you, the Alpha (or aspiring Alpha) have to work 25% harder than that 1986 Alpha to get the equivalent results he gleaned in terms of dating, seduction, and relationships. The more lean and muscular you are, the happier you’ll be, the more confident you’ll feel (in all other areas of life, like your social and business life), the longer you’ll live, the more energy you’ll have, and the less medical problems you’ll have as you age.

I could go on and on with historical examples, and I will expand on this in a future post, but the point is because of ASD, political correctness, the rise of left-liberalism, and the mutated version of feminism now embraced by some women, modern-day society is quite anti-sex in many ways as compared to historical times, as I’ve clearly demonstrated before on this blog.

Where these guys have a point is when they compare the 21st century to more traditional times, such as the 1950s or the 1800s.

I noticed that the more I’m myself in a relationship with a woman (as I see myself), the happier I am with her.

On the other hand, the more I have to change my behavior in line to what I think she would find attractive, the less satisfaction I get from that relationship.

), but completely independent of women, it makes me a happier, healthier, more fulfilled man.

Isn’t that a much more productive way to look at this?

A lot of men agree with this position, and there’s a lot of anger about it all over manosphere blogs and forums. While I to say that it isn’t true at all, that it’s just as easy to have sex with a pretty, high quality girl (and keep her with you for an extended period of time) as it was 25 or 50 years ago, even I have to admit the sad reality is there is indeed a lot of truths in the above argument.

Defining The Problem Indeed, with things like Facebook, You Tube, OKCupid, Instagram, Twitter, Ask.

While the 80s were no where near as conservative as the 50s (plenty of young unmarried people were getting laid in the 80s, believe me), I do admit that things like divorce rates were much lower, teen pregnancies were much more rare and unusual, BF/GF relationships tended to last longer, and the culture was more Reagan and Schwarzenegger than Hillary Clinton and Tina Fey. I’ve lost a lot of weight, but do you really think the only reason I did it was to get chicks?

Tags: , ,