Interesting facts about carbon dating
When scientists fail to account for so many more plants and animals in the pre-Flood biosphere and wrongly assume that plants buried in coal beds had the same proportion of carbon-14 as plants do today, their radiocarbon dating yields “ages” much higher than the true Flood age of about 4,350 years.
Volcanoes spew out CO which could just as effectively decrease the ratio.
Specimens which lived and died during a period of intense volcanism would appear older than they really are if they were dated using this technique.
Precise measurements taken over the last 140 years have shown a steady decay in the strength of the earth's magnetic field.
This means there's been a steady increase in radiocarbon production (which would increase the ratio). God, the Father, sent His only Son to satisfy that judgment for those who believe in Him.
When it comes to dating archaeological samples, several timescale problems arise.
For example, Christian time counts the birth of Christ as the beginning, AD 1 (Anno Domini); everything that occurred before Christ is counted backwards from AD as BC (Before Christ).Another limitation is that this technique can only be applied to organic material such as bone, flesh, or wood. Carbon Dating - The Premise Carbon dating is a dating technique predicated upon three things: Carbon Dating - The Controversy Carbon dating is controversial for a couple of reasons.First of all, it's predicated upon a set of questionable assumptions.We have to assume, for example, that the rate of decay (that is, a 5,730 year half-life) has remained constant throughout the unobservable past.However, there is strong evidence which suggests that radioactive decay may have been greatly accelerated in the unobservable past.We must also assume that the ratio of C-12 to C-14 in the atmosphere has remained constant throughout the unobservable past (so we can know what the ratio was at the time of the specimen's death).Tags: Adult Dating, affair dating, sex dating